01
Gather
From your sector, your offer and your core keywords come realistic prompts in the language people actually use with a chatbot.
A visibility measurement is worth exactly as much as the question set underneath it. We gather the prompts your audience actually uses and rank them by how close they sit to your business.
Why first
Every AI visibility metric is a share, and every share has a population. That population is the question set. Build it wrong and you get clean numbers about the wrong thing.
The most common mistake is using keywords as prompts. People type keywords into a search engine and write full sentences to a chatbot, often with a condition and a reason. „Crm software" and „Which CRM suits a ten person agency already on Microsoft 365?" produce entirely different answers.
The second most common mistake is a set made only of questions where you already look good. It reads well in the report and moves nothing.
Method
01
From your sector, your offer and your core keywords come realistic prompts in the language people actually use with a chatbot.
02
Prompts get grouped by topic. A cluster holding forty variants of one question is one cluster, not forty measurement points.
03
Wordings that produce the same answer come out. They cost queries and distort the share.
04
Sorted by closeness to your core business. A question that can turn into an enquiry weighs more than a general knowledge question.
05
On request with search volume from Sistrix or Ahrefs, so demand sits next to buying proximity.
06
As a spreadsheet that runs straight into monitoring. You can keep working with it without us.
Deliverable
Prompt research stands on its own. It is also the first step of the audit and the basis for ongoing monitoring.
Limits
It is not keyword research under a new name. There is no search volume for prompts, because nobody publishes what people ask chatbots. Where we add volume it comes from classic search and is an approximation, not a measurement.
It is also no guarantee of completeness. A question set is a reasoned selection. We say how it came about, so you can judge and change that selection later yourself.
And it is not final. Markets shift, wordings change, models get replaced. A set belongs reworked at least once a year, otherwise you end up measuring something nobody asks any more.
Common questions
Difference
Not a judgement on individual agencies, but a description of two approaches. The right column is checkable, because this website itself is built that way.
| Difference | Usual agency approach | agenticsearch.at |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | A proposal after a first call | A measurement with a date, before anything gets recommended |
| Basis | Keywords from classic search | A question set of real prompts, clustered and prioritised |
| Proof of success | Rankings and a visibility index | Mentions per question and system, with the raw data |
| Reporting | A monthly dashboard with curves | The same measurement repeated, change called only after three runs |
| When unsure | Try it and see what happens | We say what is not evidenced, and write it on the page |
| Tooling | Agency licences, access ends with the contract | The question set and the data are yours, afterwards too |
| Scope | As many channels as possible from one supplier | A capped number of concurrent projects, otherwise we turn it down |
Your guides
You know your business, your customers and your offer better than any agency does. What is usually missing is solid numbers on how AI systems talk about it, and an order in which to tackle that.
The number of concurrent projects is capped. When a piece of work needs more capacity than exists, we turn it down rather than take it on.
01
It starts with a measurement, not a proposal. You see in black and white which AI answers name your company and which do not, with a date and a question set.
02
Instead of a list of everything, you get an order. Every step has a result you can verify yourself, including without us.
03
Your offer and your positioning stay yours. We tell you what stands in the way of visibility and take on the technical part of it.
Next step
One conversation, 30 minutes, no sales pressure. You leave with an honest read on whether this is worth the effort for you.