Entity model
Company, people, products and locations as clearly bounded things with unambiguous names and defined relationships.
Before a system writes an answer about your company, it gathers facts. The AI Brain is the ordered version of those facts: unambiguous, maintained in one place, machine readable and dated.
Definition
We do not only build this, we run it. You can open all three of these right now and look at them.
The facts section of this site is being built and gets linked here once it stands.
An AI Brain is a company's structured fact base, built for machine reading. It answers the questions a system asks before speaking about you: who exactly is this, what does the company do, since when, where, for whom, and which details are evidenced.
The term is ours, the components are not. It covers entities, structured data, consistent details across every source, a curated short version of the site for language models, and a process that keeps all of it current.
Two things separate it from ordinary schema work. First, everything hangs in one connected graph with stable anchors rather than sitting as fragments across pages. Second, every fact carries a source and a review date. Without that a fact base goes stale quietly and nobody notices.
Components
Company, people, products and locations as clearly bounded things with unambiguous names and defined relationships.
One page per entity with evidenced details, a source note and a visible review date. Facts to look up rather than marketing copy.
JSON-LD with stable anchors that any page can reference. One graph instead of scattered fragments.
An llms.txt that orders the site, plus a Markdown version per page. Agents prefer the source over parsing HTML.
The same details in directories, profiles and press pages. Contradictions get hunted down rather than only fixed at home.
A fixed review interval, named ownership, documented changes. The part almost everyone leaves out.
Boundaries
A clean fact base makes systems describe you correctly when they talk about you. It does not make them talk about you. The mention itself depends on visibility and sources, which is what GEO and LLMO work on.
The reverse is also true: the best visibility does little when what spreads is wrong. So the AI Brain sits near the start of almost every project, right after the first measurement.
Common questions
Difference
Not a judgement on individual agencies, but a description of two approaches. The right column is checkable, because this website itself is built that way.
| Difference | Usual agency approach | agenticsearch.at |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | A proposal after a first call | A measurement with a date, before anything gets recommended |
| Basis | Keywords from classic search | A question set of real prompts, clustered and prioritised |
| Proof of success | Rankings and a visibility index | Mentions per question and system, with the raw data |
| Reporting | A monthly dashboard with curves | The same measurement repeated, change called only after three runs |
| When unsure | Try it and see what happens | We say what is not evidenced, and write it on the page |
| Tooling | Agency licences, access ends with the contract | The question set and the data are yours, afterwards too |
| Scope | As many channels as possible from one supplier | A capped number of concurrent projects, otherwise we turn it down |
Your guides
You know your business, your customers and your offer better than any agency does. What is usually missing is solid numbers on how AI systems talk about it, and an order in which to tackle that.
The number of concurrent projects is capped. When a piece of work needs more capacity than exists, we turn it down rather than take it on.
01
It starts with a measurement, not a proposal. You see in black and white which AI answers name your company and which do not, with a date and a question set.
02
Instead of a list of everything, you get an order. Every step has a result you can verify yourself, including without us.
03
Your offer and your positioning stay yours. We tell you what stands in the way of visibility and take on the technical part of it.
Next step
One conversation, 30 minutes, no sales pressure. You leave with an honest read on whether this is worth the effort for you.