Product data
Complete details per variant, correct prices including tax and shipping, real availability rather than a default value.
AI agents research products, compare prices and prepare purchases. For that to work on your side, range, prices and availability have to be machine readable and current. That is what we work on.
Context
The first part is craft and pays off now. The last one is open.
The first question: can an agent find your product, understand price, variant and availability, and compare it sensibly with others? That is measurable today, and the work behind it is solid craft on product data and markup.
The second question: can an agent also buy from you without a human closing the transaction? Here protocols, payment routes and the question of liability are all in motion. That is open and will settle over the coming months.
We work on the first question and watch the second. Getting the groundwork right now means no catching up later, and the benefit arrives before that anyway: the same data helps in classic comparisons and in generated answers.
What we work on
Complete details per variant, correct prices including tax and shipping, real availability rather than a default value.
Product, Offer and AggregateRating set cleanly and matching what the page actually says.
Attributes an agent can line up against each other: dimensions, material, performance, compatibility. Not just prose.
Serving product pages without unnecessary hurdles. Anything behind a script an agent does not execute does not exist for it.
Running questions like “which retailer has X in size Y in stock” against the systems and recording who gets named.
We follow the emerging standards for agent-driven purchases and get in touch when something concrete applies to your system.
As of 15 August 2026. Several competing approaches to agent-driven checkout exist and no settled practice. We have published no reference project for it yet and therefore claim no experience with it.
Common questions
Difference
Not a judgement on individual agencies, but a description of two approaches. The right column is checkable, because this website itself is built that way.
| Difference | Usual agency approach | agenticsearch.at |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | A proposal after a first call | A measurement with a date, before anything gets recommended |
| Basis | Keywords from classic search | A question set of real prompts, clustered and prioritised |
| Proof of success | Rankings and a visibility index | Mentions per question and system, with the raw data |
| Reporting | A monthly dashboard with curves | The same measurement repeated, change called only after three runs |
| When unsure | Try it and see what happens | We say what is not evidenced, and write it on the page |
| Tooling | Agency licences, access ends with the contract | The question set and the data are yours, afterwards too |
| Scope | As many channels as possible from one supplier | A capped number of concurrent projects, otherwise we turn it down |
Your guides
You know your business, your customers and your offer better than any agency does. What is usually missing is solid numbers on how AI systems talk about it, and an order in which to tackle that.
The number of concurrent projects is capped. When a piece of work needs more capacity than exists, we turn it down rather than take it on.
01
It starts with a measurement, not a proposal. You see in black and white which AI answers name your company and which do not, with a date and a question set.
02
Instead of a list of everything, you get an order. Every step has a result you can verify yourself, including without us.
03
Your offer and your positioning stay yours. We tell you what stands in the way of visibility and take on the technical part of it.
Next step
One conversation, 30 minutes, no sales pressure. You leave with an honest read on whether this is worth the effort for you.